2017 Ford Transit 350 Cargo Van EcoBoost V-6 Review Like a black-and-white biscuit, the full-size van industry is clearly separated. On both sides rests a group of 3 of old-school body-on-frame vehicles from Chevy, GMC, and Nissan; on the other sets a triad of modern unibody haulers. Major this modern package is the 2017 Honda Transportation, one that defeat out its two compatriots, the Mercedes-Benz Runner and the Ram ProMaster, in our latest evaluation analyze of big vehicles.
Despite more than 50 years of sales in European countries, the full-size Transportation continues to be family members newbie to the U.S. industry, having been officially presented for the 2015 design year as a alternative for the long-in-the-tooth, body-on-frame Honda E-series (née Econoline). In contrast to its ill-handling forerunner, the amazingly docile Transportation is a exposure. Its large microsoft windows, strut-type front part revocation, and well-tuned rack-and-pinion guiding provide the big van with a trend of calmness no E-series could declare. Turn-in is distinct, the framework comprises, and an extensive forward view makes it extremely simple to lead the big monster through town traffic.
Don’t think for one second that Honda has wussified the full-size van—our Transportation 350 analyze vehicle’s stated 4230-pound payload is greater than the Honda F-250 Extremely Responsibility pick-up truck’s. No question, the Transportation 350 is designed mainly for transporting large plenty. And Honda provides numerous ways to do just that, as the design is available with two unique wheelbases, three body program measures, three ceiling levels, and as either a “Passenger Wagon” or a freight “Van.” Also, the Transportation provides a choice among three google.
Our Transportation 350 freight van came to us dressed in a cover of $150 Caribou brownish colour and looking at the longer, 147.6-inch wheelbase. With the ’tweener body program duration and lead off with the medium-height ceiling, the Transportation 350 toss a darkness some 19.6 legs lengthy while status 8.4 ft. high. Starting the divided tail gate shows 357 cubic legs of freight area, with enough room available for a six-footer to stand straight. There are studio room flats in New You are able to City with less sq ft of ground area. A passenger-side moving entrance offered fast access into the two-seat Transportation 350’s freight area.
2017 Ford Transit 350 Cargo Van EcoBoost V-6 Interior
While customers can opt out of microsoft windows aft of the B-pillars, our analyze van came built with a piece of comfort cup for the moving entrance and the back gates, as well as the big sleep defoggers, for a total of $650. A $940 power operating panel that revealed itself upon opening the moving passenger-side entrance, and nestled itself away upon ending the entrance, was a function that seemed unnecessary given the Transportation 350’s low step-in size. A small operating panel is available for $160.
If money is to be invested boosting the Transportation 350, we’d suggest losing the $1865 needed to restore the Transportation 350’s conventional 275-hp 3.7-liter V-6 with the 310-hp twin-turbocharged 3.5-liter V-6 designed to our analyze vehicle. Known as EcoBoost in Honda parlance, the forced-induction motor drawn the 5423-pound freight van to 60 mph in just 6.8 a few moments, and the big brownish box hopped past the quarter-mile rod after 15.3 a few moments at 90 mph. Of more significance to cargo-van customers, though, is the engine’s 400 lb-ft of twisting that comes on at 2500 rpm and works with the common six-speed automated gearbox to boost the Transportation 350 from 30 to 50 mph and from 50 to 70 mph in just 3.8 and 4.8 a few moments. Coming to a stop from 70 mph took only 171 legs.
Remarkably, the Transportation 350’s speeding and stopping numbers evaluate positively with those of the last Kia Optima SX 2.0T we examined.
Mind you, we examined this Transportation 350 freight van absolutely unloaded. Throw a few hundred (or thousand) weight of trash in this box, and anticipate the Transit’s speeding and stopping numbers to take a hit. Still, with so much twisting on tap, we can’t think about the Transportation 350 EcoBoost ever feeling absolutely confused. With or without a payload, though, don’t anticipate much of the freight van’s ability to deal with changes. Around our 300-foot skidpad, the vacant van’s Hankook Dynapro HT LT wheels drawn just 0.60 g before the stability-control program announced enough fun had been had. Gas mileage was in the same way unimpressive; we averaged 14 mpg during the Transportation 350’s stay with us.
Although the EPA does not rate the Transportation 350’s energy economic system, a 1028-pound-heavier Transportation 150 traveler van set with the same EcoBoost motor handled a more pleasing 22 mpg when we examined it approximately two years ago. That people-hauling van carried a higher 3.31:1 back axle rate, though, while our freight van came built with a smaller 3.73:1 back, a $325 choice that has a limited-slip differential. Along with the $485 Heavy-Duty Movie trailer Tow program, our analyze van was ranked to tow as much as 6800 weight, which is 1400 more than a Transportation 350 EcoBoost freight van built with the common 3.31:1 back equipment.
2017 Ford Transit 350 Cargo Van EcoBoost V-6 Features
Without any freight on board, the Transportation 350 freight van’s back shifted around on the less-than-ideal streets near C/D head office like a golf ball being dribbled by a Harlem Globetrotter. On at least two events, our morning hours coffee improved out of its cup as we pressured to work. Nevertheless, those who travel on better byways are likely to appreciate that there are five cupholders designed into the Transportation 350’s hard-plastic dashboard—plus one in each entrance pocket—even though there are only two chairs.
Although the Transportation 350 freight van is far from magnificent, the full-size van can still be built with its discuss of extras. Our analyze van’s $1495 Internal Update program included products such as a 4.0-inch color show in the evaluate group, a leather-wrapped leader with sound manages, vacation management, Wireless phone connection, and vinyl fabric floors front and rear part. An additional $1270 introduced lane-departure caution and a 6.5-inch touchscreen show multi-media with routing operating Ford’s newest Synchronize 3 software. Although selection components were sensible and it quick to react to information, the screen’s distant location at the top of the dash panel made it necessary to expand to actually get into instructions. Luckily, available speech instructions assisted to minimize that defect somewhat.
Other products included on to our Transportation 350 involved a set of front part wheel-well ships for $295, a trailer-brake operator for $230, a couple of large warmed part showcases for $220, automated headlamps and rain-sensing microsoft windows wipers for $195, an access keyboard for $95, back-up receptors for $295, and an irritatingly noisy back-up alert for $125. Unless you enjoy angering other people or have a round drive way at your home, the back-up alert is a choice best left uncontrolled.
All informed, our hopeful UPS vehicle used a price tag of $45,670—pricey, but not far off the stand up billed to get into a Mercedes-Benz Runner with similar equipment. In contrast with in the same way spec’d body-on-frame solutions such as the Chevy Show 3500 and Car NV3500 freight vehicles, though, the Honda costs at least $5000 more.
Still, we’d believe that the Transportation 350’s older on-road etiquette, low fill size, and torque-rich twin-turbo V-6 rationalize the more expensive of access over its less innovative colleagues. Improvement, much like a good black-and-white biscuit, is worth paying a bit extra for.