2016 Mercedes-Benz GLC300 / GLC300 4MATIC Review With cross-over SUVs now outselling vehicles, the newest Mercedes-Benz access into the fast-growing lightweight section seems going to become the marque’s top seller instantly. It’s been on selling since Dec, so you’ve probably already noticed these leather-lined purchasing trolleys populating your regional Neiman Marcus and Whole Meals vehicle parking plenty.
Stepping in for the former GLK-class for 2016, the new GLC-class goes onto the newest C-class program and assumes the new Mercedes-Benz nomenclature. And a lot is different besides the name. While it stocks revocation and drivetrain components with the C-class automobile, the wheelbase and monitor size are higher. In all, the GLC300 actions 4.7 inches wide more time and 2.0 inches wide broader than its forerunner. A more commodious back chair and extended freight keep are welcome advantages, and it all comes without the typical bodyweight charge. Actually the GLC300 and the GLC300 4MATIC examined here considered 275 and 128 weight less than did very same 2013 GLK designs we examined nearly Four decades back.
For the new style, we again examined both rear- and all-wheel-drive versions with the 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder, which is the whole style variety at the moment. The rear-driver is one of few in a category where choosing out of AWD results in deciding for front-drive. Stuttgart plans to complete this variety with diesel fuel, plug-in multiple, and AMG high-performance versions in later style decades, plus a hydrogen fuel-cell style and one of those insane fastback “coupe” crossovers to experience off against the BMW X4. While attractive and stylistically in track with its automobile (and coupe) platform-mates, the GLC’s external information hews more carefully to category standards than did that of the particularly squared-off, wagon-esque GLK. It’ll combination into the group in those shopping-center vehicle parking plenty and carpool drop-off paths, which might be the best thing for those who don’t want to experience over the top moving a Benz in amongst the neighbors’ Kias and Hondas.
The drivetrain, too, shows the existing automobile hive-mind with yet another 2.0-liter four-cylinder turbocompresseur device, with a rating of 241 horse power. This supplants the GLK350’s 3.5-liter V-6, which made 302 horse power. That energy optimum is turning into ordinary for a turbocompresseur four of this dimension, printed by Kia, Honda, and Chevrolet among others. This turbocompresseur four’s 273 lb-ft of twisting is similar to the ranking of the former V-6, and the new car’s nine-speed computerized gear box has two more percentages to have fun with than did the GLK’s gear box. An result is that EPA town scores are up 3 mpg across the panel, while the 28-mpg road ranking distributed by both GLCs is up 3 and 4 mpg over the commensurate rear-drive and 4MATIC GLK designs. Our noticed gas mileage of 21 mpg with the 4MATIC and 24 with the rear-driver is 2 and 3 mpg better than we got in our analyze of the 2013 GLKs.
The turbocharged engine’s early-arriving twisting allows the GLC300 get to 60 mph in 6.0 a few moments (RWD) and 5.9 a few moments (4MATIC), or just 0.3- and 0.1-second more slowly than did the V-6 GLK. Most of the competitors goes around 6.0 a few moments, too, so this minor backsliding won’t get noticed except, perhaps, by those dealing in a late-model GLK. The GLC also is more slowly to 100 mph (by a complete 2.0 seconds), and the top-gear 30-to-50-mph and 50-to-70-mph times can also improve by 0.3 to 0.7 second—those might have been more intense but the nine-speed provides more maximum options than could the old seven-cog transmitting. The efficiency seems completely sufficient in regular generating circumstances, though, and customers in this section who care are probably patiently waiting on the AMG edition, anyway.
2016 Mercedes-Benz GLC300 / GLC300 4MATIC Interior
Track numbers that were more obvious on the street are the enhanced stopping efficiency, with 70-to-0-mph prevents developing in 166 and 174 legs, smaller by an important 15 legs for the rear-drive style but only one feet for the 4MATIC. Skidpad roadholding of 0.84 g represents progress from 0.77 for the rear-driver, but the 4MATIC did 0.81, similar to its predecessor’s efficiency.
We’re informed that Bmw developers succeeded upon technicians for bigger tires for the GLC, with 18-inchers now conventional and both 19- and 20-inch improvements provided. The GLC300 4MATIC had the 18s, dressed in mud-and-snow-graded 235/60 Navigator tires with a run-flat style. The rear-drive example had a lot more optionally available devices, such as the fashionable, dark AMG 20-inch tires and Bridgestone Dueler summer time rubberized, dimension 255/45, which again were run-flats. Rim variations are undoubtedly shown in the rear-drive car’s excellent cornering and stopping numbers. Given how much simpler it was to release the 4MATIC car without extreme wheelspin, we suspicious the speeding gap might have been broader if both illustrations had the same tire.
The quality of drive would have to be a lot creamier than it is to prevent the accidental reversals and difficulties that beset us when trying to use the COMAND system’s oversensitive touch pad, which controls the many functions on the center-console display. Best to use the turning button or do everything while sitting or at least stopped—changing functions while on the shift is annoying and often finishes in cursing it and walking away from the effort. For this, you pay $2330? The Rolls royce and BMW connections are better.
The Powerful Choose program that adapts the car’s efficiency on an way up range from Eco through Convenience and up to Sport+ represents useful variations and is much simpler to handle. Other computerized techniques also work well—Mercedes-Benz’s Distronic Plus flexible vacation management, part of the $2800 Car owner Support package—may well set the marketplace conventional, and its relevant driver helps always be you’d anticipate.
One way that Bmw obtained more freight area with the GLC was by modifying to run-flat tires. The GLK had an water lightweight belly fat nestled under the freight ground, but the GLC has none. This undoubtedly allows pare overall bodyweight, but the firm sidewalls and a little bit bulkier development of run-flat tires boosts the unsprung huge the revocation has to handle. Our motorists mentioned a jarring reaction to some street problems. It was more intense in the rear-drive example with higher tires, but even the 4MATIC amazed us with a clear distress or two. Both analyze vehicles had the conventional, steel-spring revocation that we’ve recommended over the not compulsory, air-spring AIRMATIC flexible installation in the C-class automobile and vehicle. With this wheel-and-tire program, though, there might be something to suggest the update.
2016 Mercedes-Benz GLC300 / GLC300 4MATIC Features
Although the top quality price Mercedes-Benz instructions for industry standards of motor requirements and overall efficiency seems extreme, the medial side planning and sessions go numerous methods toward justifying the additional expenditure. Especially in the rear-drive style built with $3950 value of Designo-spec black-and-white nappa set, ash timber cut, and lots of natty accessories (ambient illumination, lighted doorsills, top-stitched door-panel cut, etc.). Never ignore the effectiveness of a little mild to raise the atmosphere of a Northerner having difficulties under the midwinter perma-cloud.
It’s also silent within and the guiding, braking system, and transmitting controls (once you get used to that strange little gear-selector wand) react like well-balanced resources. Whereas the old GLK’s back chair was appropriate for grownups only for fast sprint to supper, we could imagine a long journey in the aft section of the GLC. It would take only a little packaging self-discipline to fit a weekend’s value of baggage for two couples; self-discipline unable, there’s the top holder.
The platform MSRP on the rear-driver is $2000 reduced than for the 4MATIC car, but once all the accessories were included on, in general expected $2740 the other way. That Designo internal was the greatest distinction. Both had the Car owner Support program, Multi-media program (COMAND with navigation), Lighting program (full LED effective headlamps with computerized great supports, $1500), and Premium program (keyless key, a 115-volt AC energy store and satellite tv stereo, $720). Both Monroneys also revealed the stand-alone choice of warmed back chairs ($620); the Designo program incorporates heated/ventilated front side chairs, while the 4MATIC car had $580 warmed front side chairs. They also distributed Burmester sound ($850) and special-order warmed windows units ($205). Only the 4MATIC had a $430 choice for the ability traveler chair with storage. The rear-drive model’s 20-inch-wheel program included $750, and it also had a $2950 Game program (AMG body system add-ons, MB-Tex covers for the sprint and entrance panels) and the $300 Evening program (extensive dark external cut, plus firefox tailpipes). Great.
There’s more to be had, beginning with the above mentioned $1900 Air Body Control, so it’s easy to force the tag beyond $60,000, which if you ask us is a big collection of money to fall on a 2.0-liter cross-over. We completely anticipate the marketplace will not believe the reality and traders will be battling over their proportion.