2017 Honda Civic HF Review Here’s a casebook illustration of why substitute technologies such as hybrids and electrics are owning a rough go within the marketplace: conventional vehicles just keep obtaining better, too, from time to time by sharing the same “advances” pioneered by their supposed betters. From the HF trim level examined right here, Honda gives a low-cost/high-mpg Civic attractive to frugal-minded car-shoppers who could possibly otherwise land in the smaller B-segment hatch (including Honda’s personal Match) or possibly a hybrid.
2017 Honda Civic HF Review
By scratching off its products list hefty hardware which include a glass moonroof, energy adjustable heated seats, and climate handle although producing a few judicious adjustments (notably including underbody panels to reduce drag and applying low-mass, low-drag aluminum wheels), the HF gets both improved fuel economy along with a sticker price tag of only $20,730.
That is just about a fixed figure, as well. Those who’d favor to ladle on solutions are invited to decide on a diverse Civic model, which includes the Hybrid, which might be had with add-ons which include navigation and a total leather interior. These solely concerned with their personal carbon footprints are presumably impressed from the Hybrid’s 45-mpg EPA combined rating (up one mpg from the a single we tested a 12 months ago). We recorded 38 mpg in that one, versus 33 in this HF and 28 mpg in an all-the-toys 2014 EX-L with all the exact same drivetrain.
The frugal-minded are notorious for basically doing the math prior to they publish the initial check as well as most affordable (no leather, no navigation) Hybrid is $25,425 although an EX-L with nav is just $305 below that. It is possible to obtain a lot of gasoline for almost $5000, causing our penny-pincher to consider the HF.
2017 Honda Civic HF Interior
If our miser drives extra like the EPA and much less like we do at Auto and Driver, the situation is all the more convincing mainly because the HF’s 35-mpg EPA mixed rating is up 2 mpg for 2014. It managed this by adopting the continuously variable transmission (CVT) that also replaces a five-speed automated in most of your rest from the variety.
For 2013, only the Hybrid had a CVT. We didn’t imagine remarkably of this new CVT when the 2014 Civic sedan positioned fourth, ahead of only the Toyota Corolla, in a five-way comparison check. We wish the HF offered a manual transmission (our miserly close friends agree, nevertheless harboring the illusion they can control the engine extra efficiently than a pricey, electronically controlled CVT). Nevertheless it doesn’t, and our low regard for CVTs is subjective when the advantages effortlessly pencil out.
The Civic HF saw its EPA fuel-economy rating rise from 29/41 mpg city/highway to 31/41, giving it an general 35 versus the 33 for your 2013 example we tested with all the outdated five-speed automatic. As stated, we noticed 33 mpg in our check, that is essentially 1 mpg worse than we acquired with the five-speed, likely a side impact of our constantly booting the gasoline pedal in search of livelier response. Exactly where the old five-speed automated had a low-ratio initial gear to generate a quick launch, the CVT has a extra leisurely character when the light turns green
2017 Honda Civic HF Features
The HF shares the 143-hp 1.8-liter VTEC four-cylinder together with the a lot more plushly trimmed EX-L sedan we tested with this transmission. But here are a few much more numbers that pencil out in this model’s frugal favor: at 2693 lbs, it’s twenty lighter than its 2013 equivalent and 180 lighter than the final hybrid we tested. Carrying 178 fewer lbs compared to the EX-L onto our check track, the HF acquired to 60 mph in eight.3 seconds, the very best time we’ve recorded to get a non-Si Civic sedan.
Sadly, the HF’s fuel-miser mission puts the base model’s front-disc/rear-drum brake setup behind people light-weight wheels and wraps them in the same low-friction/low-traction Bridgestone Ecopia tires that serve the Hybrid. It managed only 0.76 g of skidpad roadholding and took 189 feet to prevent from 70 mph. With grippier Michelin rubber and four-wheel discs, the EX-L made a far better displaying (0.85 g and 165 feet).
Enjoyment on a twisty road isn't the mission right here, however. Minimal operating costs and many motor vehicle for that cash possess a selected old-school appeal that makes this HF more Henry Ford than Henrik Fisker. We’ll note the latter individual is actually a lot of enjoyable when the former, well, he was better at finding his sums appropriate.